<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding when you&#8217;re tired and unmotivated</title>
	<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/</link>
	<description>Mostly programming with a few bits of other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Arto Bendiken</title>
		<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42041</link>
		<author>Arto Bendiken</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42041</guid>
					<description>I also do the 'IDEAS' file per project directory, except I call mine 'NOTES' :-) Agreed on all the points you mention, but I have one more that I've come to believe is crucial: source code revision control, even for personal projects.

It doesn't matter whether one uses a local SVN repository, SVK, Darcs, Git, or whatever. But it does wonders for a steady, incremental sense of progress to check in code. Even if I have only 30 minutes to work on a pet project, when I check in the results of that I feel I've achieved something.

The next time I continue on that particular project, I know I have the last known-good stable version safely backed up in the repository, and I can do whatever experiments I want; if I mess things up, I can just diff my latest changes to see where I screwed up, or even revert back to where I was. Does wonders for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also do the &#8216;IDEAS&#8217; file per project directory, except I call mine &#8216;NOTES&#8217; <img src='http://phildawes.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Agreed on all the points you mention, but I have one more that I&#8217;ve come to believe is crucial: source code revision control, even for personal projects.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter whether one uses a local SVN repository, SVK, Darcs, Git, or whatever. But it does wonders for a steady, incremental sense of progress to check in code. Even if I have only 30 minutes to work on a pet project, when I check in the results of that I feel I&#8217;ve achieved something.</p>
<p>The next time I continue on that particular project, I know I have the last known-good stable version safely backed up in the repository, and I can do whatever experiments I want; if I mess things up, I can just diff my latest changes to see where I screwed up, or even revert back to where I was. Does wonders for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Dawes</title>
		<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42089</link>
		<author>Phil Dawes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42089</guid>
					<description>Hi Arto,

That's good advice. All my projects until recently have been shared and so I've had a cvs or svn repository to work with. 
I assumed that this one wouldn't attract any other coders (given that it's written in gambit scheme), but hadn't thought about just using a repository anyway. Time to crank up git.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arto,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good advice. All my projects until recently have been shared and so I&#8217;ve had a cvs or svn repository to work with.<br />
I assumed that this one wouldn&#8217;t attract any other coders (given that it&#8217;s written in gambit scheme), but hadn&#8217;t thought about just using a repository anyway. Time to crank up git.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arto Bendiken</title>
		<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42188</link>
		<author>Arto Bendiken</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phildawes.net/blog/2007/07/23/coding-when-youre-tired-and-unmotivated/#comment-42188</guid>
					<description>On the contrary, I find Gambit-C a most interesting Scheme implementation - it's the one I use most often right after Chicken. And as it happens, I'm also currently working on triple stores in Scheme - it's a small world, that we meet here at the end of the long tail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, I find Gambit-C a most interesting Scheme implementation - it&#8217;s the one I use most often right after Chicken. And as it happens, I&#8217;m also currently working on triple stores in Scheme - it&#8217;s a small world, that we meet here at the end of the long tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
