Comments on: Java cage rattling http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/ Mostly programming with a few bits of other stuff Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:38:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1 By: James Burton http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9875 James Burton Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:03:11 +0000 http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9875 Java is an imperative OO language and should not be compared to functional languages. Java is an imperative OO language and should not be compared to functional languages.

]]> By: Ian Rogers http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9878 Ian Rogers Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:38:56 +0000 http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9878 I think that's the point of the article: pure "Java programmers" are only a step up from VB weenies ;-) and many have no concept of functional languages except that "they're a bit hard to write in". And as for declarative/logical languages... I think that’s the point of the article: pure “Java programmers” are only a step up from VB weenies ;-) and many have no concept of functional languages except that “they’re a bit hard to write in”. And as for declarative/logical languages…

]]> By: Phil Dawes http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9880 Phil Dawes Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:06:37 +0000 http://phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/02/java-cage-rattling/#comment-9880 <blockquote>pure “Java programmers” are only a step up from VB weenies ;-) and many have no concept of functional languages except that “they’re a bit hard to write in”</blockquote> Blimey - if that's not a troll I don't know what is!

pure “Java programmers” are only a step up from VB weenies ;-) and many have no concept of functional languages except that “they’re a bit hard to write in”

Blimey - if that’s not a troll I don’t know what is!

]]>