<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: can we remove the need for ordered collections?</title>
	<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2005/02/28/replacing-ordered-collections/</link>
	<description>Mostly programming with a few bits of other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Cerra</title>
		<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2005/02/28/replacing-ordered-collections/#comment-705</link>
		<author>Jimmy Cerra</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phildawes.net/blog/2005/02/28/replacing-ordered-collections/#comment-705</guid>
					<description>I don't think I agree.  Right now RDF is to directed graphs is like what S-expressions are to lists.  If the order of statements was significant then it would drifting a lot further away from that ideal.  Yet, it is the directed graph intepretation which makes RDF more useful for some types of data modeling than plain-old XML.  Besides, it is too late to change RDF significantly.  Too many applications already depend on the current interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I agree.  Right now RDF is to directed graphs is like what S-expressions are to lists.  If the order of statements was significant then it would drifting a lot further away from that ideal.  Yet, it is the directed graph intepretation which makes RDF more useful for some types of data modeling than plain-old XML.  Besides, it is too late to change RDF significantly.  Too many applications already depend on the current interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Dawes</title>
		<link>http://phildawes.net/blog/2005/02/28/replacing-ordered-collections/#comment-714</link>
		<author>Phil Dawes</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phildawes.net/blog/2005/02/28/replacing-ordered-collections/#comment-714</guid>
					<description>Jimmy Cerra Writes:
&lt;em&gt;Yet, it is the directed graph intepretation which makes RDF more useful for some types of data modeling than plain-old XML.&lt;/em&gt;

Definately, but retaining statement order doesn't mean ditching the directed-graph interpretation. 

&lt;em&gt; it is too late to change RDF significantly.  Too many applications already depend on the current interpretation.&lt;/em&gt;

Of course you're right, but it's interesting to explore the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy Cerra Writes:<br />
<em>Yet, it is the directed graph intepretation which makes RDF more useful for some types of data modeling than plain-old XML.</em></p>
<p>Definately, but retaining statement order doesn&#8217;t mean ditching the directed-graph interpretation. </p>
<p><em> it is too late to change RDF significantly.  Too many applications already depend on the current interpretation.</em></p>
<p>Of course you&#8217;re right, but it&#8217;s interesting to explore the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
